The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which my be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following charts illustrate the average percentages of sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar, which may be unhealthy in the case of eating too much, in daily meals of American people.
As can be clearly observed from the first chart, the biggest proportion of Americans dinner is sodium by 43%. They consume the equal percentage of sodium in their breakfast and diner which is 14%, while their lunch contains 29% of sodium. According to the second graph, unlike breakfast which has the lowest share of saturated fat by 16%, the biggest percentage belongs to dinner by 37%. The proportions of saturated fat in snacks and lunch are 21% and 26%, respectively.
Added sugar is presented in the third chat which its pattern is downright different from both sodium and saturated fat. The proportion of snake is 42% far mor than breakfast by 16%. Through eating lunch, the population of USA absorb 19% of added sugar. At the same time, their diner contains 23% of sugar.
It is clear from the charts that despite the fact that American people’s breakfast consists of the lowest amount of three types of potential unhealthy ingredients, sodium and saturated fat in Americans dinner alongside sugar in their snacks have the highest percentage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-07 | sattar_iust | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | sattar_iust | 61 | view |
- People s poor health is because of lifestyle how the lifestyle influences the health And how national health services should response to the issue how should health medical department responds 77
- The chart below shows the amount of spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 89
- We have entered a throw away society and fill the environment with rubbish What are the causes and what are your solutions 88
- Government should allocate resources prior to the technology research do you agree or disagree Give your own experience and examples 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02415458937 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58475325329 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4703867957 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119271719908 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047553219062 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644442473844 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955540339843 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779080988854 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.