Which one has the greater impact on human’s life, aeroplanes or cars?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the impact of aeroplanes and cars on human’s life" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that using cars might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using aeroplanes can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, the impact of aeroplanes on human’s life can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that consuming less fuel and cost efficiency are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the impacts of airplanes on people's economy. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both selling tickets and construction of airports distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of climate science, without the slightest doubt, the impact of cars on human’s life might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of climate change. Moreover, fundamental aspects of greenhouse gas emissions can relate to the reality that the demerits of fossil fuels can pertain to engines. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of electric cars were correlated positively with the invention of efficient batteries, the local authorities would ultimately address global warming. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of using bicycles.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of aeroplanes far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7276119403 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17877818731 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.799480338 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.545454545 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270814751844 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853493634175 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100250702204 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141742780583 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661567746776 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.