In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words.
Recently, the phenomenon of hungry people around the world and its corresponding impacts have sparked a massive dispute. In this regard, whereas nations have experienced groundbreaking advances in terms of agriculture in recent decades, the number of people who couldn’t provide themselves with sufficient food are drastically climbing yet. In my view, such causes as wasting and mismanagement can be taken into account. Meanwhile, a few solutions are proposed.
Undoubtedly, squander is one of ever-increasing concerns in wealthy nations. Waste materials in almost every aspect of modern life, particularly food, ends up loads of other people remaining hungry. What’s more, according miscellaneous studies, nearly 10% of crops are spoiled due to inappropriate transportation methods or some natural events such as drought and changing patterns of weather around the four corners of the globe.
In addition, mismanagement is another major reason which leads to growing starvation. Spending countries budgets on purchasing warfare equipment rather than importing food resources or enhancement of irrigation techniques are manifestations of mismanagement. Nowadays, various countries involved in wars. Consequently, wars pave the way to spread the scarceness of foods amongst their populations, mostly among children.
However, authorities can come up with a few, but impressive, solutions. For instance, based on UN suggestions, if people who live in developed countries are capable of saving a slight percentage of their wasted foods, it is likely that a remarkable number of individuals don’t witness their children sleeping without eating dinner anymore. Moreover, developing practical management policies and voluntary helps of developed nations to underdeveloped countries regarding management education and financial aids are other plausible answers.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on cause and solutions of agricultural advances and its relation to hungry people, I am inclined to believe that squander and mismanagement contribute to major parts of this matter. I am pondering about the fact the leaders of such countries as North Korea claim that we make eye-catching progresses in missiles while their population deprive the pleasure of eating delicious meals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88288288288 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23633175255 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684684684685 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7511977252 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4375 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113293131523 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303221606085 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336853261983 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0571691003739 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438318608269 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.