Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which consider to be the most effective.
Comics
Books
radio
television
film
theater
Recently, the phenomenon miscellaneous types of media and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, apart from enormous benefits of such distinctive media as film, comics, books, radio, TV, and theater, their disadvantages should be taken into account. In my mind, amongst several communicating media, books, radio, and film have higher priorities.
First of all, we should consider books as the first means of information dissemination. According to archaeologists, our ancestors all around the four corners of the globe, tended to write down in various stuffs such as leather or wooden plates. Hence, books are the oldest media among all other types. Authors have the ability to spread their ideas and innovations by means of books regardless of time or expenditure. Meanwhile, readers under any circumstances have the opportunity to peruse books. However, we shouldn’t lose sight of spending at least a couple of hours, even weeks, to complete reading a tome.
Undoubtedly, radio is the medium of voice. Radio paves the way to promote audiences’ creativity, as psychologists’ findings. Unlike such media as cinema or theater, purchasing fairly expensive tickets is not considered as difficulties. Nevertheless, such humans as who suffer hearing disabilities cannot exploit radio.
Turning to film, films, consequently cinema industry were born at early 1900s. As history of cinema says, films were silent at first decades and Hollywood along with its Asian version, Bollywood, are monarchies of cinema realms nowadays. Film-makers and supporter companies are capable of elucidating their beliefs and thoughts through three-hour films. Some critics are of the opinion that film is ranked as the most powerful media due to recent sophisticated visual effects. In contrast, spending rather big proportion of family budget or time are considered as its negative sides.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on cons and pros of different media, I opt to support vigorously the idea that books are the most priceless medium during the written history of mankind. Who knows where we are now without the advent of writing and books?
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-04-16 | sattar_iust | 84 | view |
- City population has been growing rapidly To cope with this problem should we rely on city planners or new policies 88
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the m 56
- Technology allows us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past Do you agree or disagree 88
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, apart from eno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ficulties. Nevertheless, such humans as who suffer hearing disabilities cannot expl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, apart from, at least, in contrast, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46290801187 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00296735905 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649851632047 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7114041107 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.05 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.85 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228898255758 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059452021564 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459150915223 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113303593194 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395362988729 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.