With technology speeding up, more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet, but old people have little chance to be exposed to them. What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people? How can old people be encouraged to use this new technology?
Nowadays, youngsters are being able to deal with technological advancements faster than old people because of the need, sometimes for studying and sometimes for work. However, elderly ought to have the chance of using mobiles and internet because of some circunstamces being disussed in this article.
It is argueed that everyone is capable of using mobile phones due to the fact that who was born in 21th century is more exposed to the technology than old people. The latter had not been faced with new technologies because some decades ago the internet was starting to develop and other ways of communication likewise. Elderly did not need to fret about the technological advancements because everything was easier to obtain, however, noawadays everything is far-reaching, then olders should be urged on learning how to use new technologies so as to get in touch with their relatives.
Moreover, cellphones and internet are crucial to everyone due to the fact that they support us an easier communication. For example, there is no need to sign up newspaper as people used to do some decades ago. Those technologies provide us a fast way to acquire news merely by using mobiles for reading and also watching TV.
Finally, being capable to use those technologies would make old people's life much easier, then there is the necessity of them being giving the eletronics for usage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...on learning how to use new technologies so as to get in touch with their relatives. Mo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06140350877 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8590570908 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600877192982 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2356843556 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.222222222 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380382118801 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147658404427 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745513760845 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232516793583 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526383044932 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.