There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of the mobile phone?
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical days reveals that the mobile phone associated a several problem of the social medical has been one of the prominent topic in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyzed and explain regarding this nation. This essay is an attempt to examine the pros and cons before arriving at a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the several advantages of mobile phone. Firstly, mobile help lots of thing such as study purposes if any difficulties in study time we can easy find the topic with the help of internet on mobile phone. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that search for any medical science study on mobile phone it is easy to carry the pocket as compare to the laptop and computer other electronic devices.
However, there are roses where are thorns too. There are many drawbacks in the mobile phone mostly people carry to mobile the heart pocket there are many side effect to heart people for suffering for the heart diseases and other chronic diseases. Yet another negative effect that in the recent time most of people use many time using phone and suffering internet their eyes vision week masses face on decrease the eyes slight.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the mobile is the many beneficial for person but their darker side cannot be neglect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'several problems'.
Suggestion: several problems
...eals that the mobile phone associated a several problem of the social medical has been one of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...s of mobile phone. Firstly, mobile help lots of thing such as study purposes if any difficult...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...negative effect that in the recent time most of people use many time using phone and suffering...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...t in the recent time most of people use many time using phone and suffering internet thei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their darker side cannot be neglect.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92164179104 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42146355391 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3592055813 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219852822211 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746762517937 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780144656188 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116385625248 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432956069034 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.