Marking strategy for big companies should be places on offer and discount, and in what ways this can impact their reputation.
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals that strategy for highest companies is provided by discount and offer is very important for company and positive effect on their reputation has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain my viewpoint for given statement before arriving at a logical conclusion.
To begin with, the strategy for major companies should provide offer and discount the number of company can grow without following some particular strategy. I would cite example for if any case companies should be offer in branded thing most of customer buys products rate is increment. Moreover the can work in long time run then increase the profit of companies they can should provide the job opportunity.
However the strategy for big companies is excellent impact on reputation owing to it helps in attracting more customers. Yet another thing that it attracts more and more customers as the discourse spreads from one customer to other.
Before putting my pen down I would like to encapsulate my viewpoint by saying that judicious to each and every company the reputation will grow automatically when the long queue is before the shop. More benefit for company and customer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...stomer buys products rate is increment. Moreover the can work in long time run then incr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...an should provide the job opportunity. However the strategy for big companies is excel...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, another thing, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13452914798 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71007884353 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600896860987 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1719484604 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295596261068 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118129563177 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946959719261 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159521173029 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895215723989 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.