Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the sorld. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high – for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
Tobacco is the main product of cigarette which is broadly consumed drugs around billion adults all over the world. It would worsely affect the health for smokers as well as those who are surrounded in the society. Here I am going to talk about that the smokers are very responsible for this evil act.
Firstly, the health of the citizens are in the hand of government not in public. They could do anything in the right position to ban and block the cigarettes which is imported and manufactured. They would punish the criminal those who overtakes the government. The cigarettes should be prohibited and provide proper education to the public by the government.
Secondly, the smokers could take special oath to leave up this bad habits which affects the lungs and others as well. They have to realize the demerits and horror diseases by these cigarettes. They would analyse about the money spending, health deficiences etc.
In conclusion, everyone in this world are responsible to one another. It could saved the society and family in this universe. They could educate the risk of heart attact, lung cancer and other arteries diseases for this smoking. They should realise this facts to avoid to least enjoy the matters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'save'
Suggestion: save
...re responsible to one another. It could saved the society and family in this universe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s for this smoking. They should realise this facts to avoid to least enjoy the matte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 1207.87684729 85% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97572815534 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49426243294 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597087378641 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 379.143842365 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.7428623113 50.4703680194 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.2142857143 104.977214359 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7142857143 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123338310682 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409297647716 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513738262781 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794585091688 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846816146341 0.0609392437508 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.1260098522 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.