Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the sorld. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high – for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
In this burgeoning epoch of convincing people to give up smoking, a contemporary human dwells in a world which is shaped by the latest trends and approaches coming across the globe points for years. The opponents and proponents have their perceptual intellection to support their ideas. Before deducing a fair conclusion, I am going to shed some light on both the aspects in the upcoming paragraphs.
According to the first school of the thought, many people say that the government can play a vital role to raise awareness among the citizens of the country against the harmful effect of smoking tobacco. Apart from that, to aware masses about the deadly effects of smoking, the government can use cigarette packaging to display its ill effects. In addition to it, the government can apply strict rules and regulations to counter smoking.
However, few others believe that it is ultimately the person who smokes a cigarette. They believe that the smoker has to understand the harmful effects of smoking tobacco. Last but not least, to ban the tobacco products the smoker must cut the consumption of smoking cigarette then there would not be any demand for it.
To prorate, after having lots of thoughts and deliberations with myself on this topic, I inclined to state that yes protect from such products also lies with an individual’s willpower but we cannot ignore the fact that the solution requires both legitimate action of Government and individuals to end the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, then, well, apart from, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10204081633 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77657842589 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65306122449 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1098446068 50.4703680194 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996619311977 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041114368106 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502386872784 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565799780609 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611545414338 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.