Tourism can bring jobs and money into struggling economies. However, some people argue that tourism should not be promoted in natural environments because of the harm it does. Discuss your view and support with reasons and examples from your own experience, observations r reading.
Tourism plays a crucial part in nation’s economy because it provides opportunities for people to see new things and learn about new culture. However, some people argue that tourism should note be promoted in natural environments because of the harm it does. This essay will discuss despite tourism widely contributes in nation’s economy, still it should be restricted in natural environments and thus provide a reasonable conclusion.
To commence with, the first and foremost, tourism contributes in economic growth as it brings foreign currency and promotes local businesses. More tourists mean more hotels, more services which means more employment for the people in country. It also helps some families and communities can be lifted out of poverty. For example, Nepal, the Himalayan nation’s much income comes from tourism and it boosts local hospitality industry significantly. Therefore, tourism industry helps to improve economic growth.
On the flip side, tourism puts pressure on pristine environment and specifically natural habitants of wild life. More tourists required more place to live, more roads, more car parking which leads more deforestation and more pollution and causing the harm for wild animals and marine life. For instance, in China, people believe to drop a coin in sea to get blessing from God but those all coins were gulped by a tortoise and all coins were removed by surgery and saved his life. So, tourism seriously affecting and harming natural environment and habitants of wild animals and marine creature.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that tourism contributes to improve country’s economy but greatly harming the natural environment and habitants. In my opinion, tourism should be restricted in natural environment to save environment and wild life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 8.36945812808 227% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56583629893 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92502878043 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548042704626 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.739383009 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300493919336 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126338395147 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114768314835 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201829283125 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909302311949 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.