In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, mega shopping centre has become more and more popular in high population density area. While some people agree that large shopping centres should supersede local corner shops, others argue that this should not be encouraged. This essay will discuss why policy makers should encourage the mall culture.
There are an increasing number of large shopping complexes in main cities. It is more convenient and less time consuming to shop in these shopping centres. They help customers save time and effort to travel from one place to another to buy different products. The centres bring many vendors under one roof. A vendor can either be a giant retailer which offers a variety of products or a showroom which displays all products of one or several brands. The vendor can also be local small businesses. As a result, the shopping centres should be favoured over local corner shops.
Some people believe that large shopping centres impose threats to small local shops and will destroy competition in local retailing market. However, these shopping centres create opportunities for mutual growth within businesses. For instance, when people go to a standalone cinema, they can buy snacks and watch the movie. However, if the cinema is housed in a shopping mall, people can see their friends, hang out for lunch or enjoy some other entertaining services then go to the cinema. The cinema not just brings customers to the other businesses but also attracts more customers to the cinema owing to the availability of different activities and services.
To conclude, both mega shopping centres and small local shops have their own advantage and disadvantage. In my opinion, mega shopping centres should be welcomed due to the convenience it offers to customers and how the centres support small businesses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15593220339 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5515540437 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5485844443 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4705882353 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315543350197 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113999727215 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961908794941 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210147606078 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271918052948 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.