Traveling by air among rich and ordinary people . To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of traveling by air among rich and ordinary people which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that traveling is beneficial for rich peoples for instance, rich people always traveling in world as well as they gain experience and enjoyment their life. Another pivotal aspect for the argument is that rich people wants to spend their many in traveling and entertain their self with traveling. Needless to say that all these merits stand traveling by air among rich and ordinary people in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that ordinary people never travel in their life because they have no extra money to travel outside the country. As an illustration, poor people only want to spend their money for their children. Besides, poor have no money that’s why they only travel by trains as well as poor people cannot afford traveling expenditures. Hence, it is apparent why many are against traveling by air among rich and ordinary people.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefit of traveling by air among rich and ordinary are instrument indeed. The potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to travel'.
Suggestion: to travel
...ns as well as poor people cannot afford traveling expenditures. Hence, it is apparent why...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, so, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13483146067 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57751927352 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513108614232 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5502672132 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307155807115 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143673393789 0.0925447433944 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103384715817 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207073194501 0.151781067708 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038366462122 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.