Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?
Education is the most crucial phase of everyone's life whether study locally or travel to study, but it has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention of the public. It can be agreed that studying internationally is an excellent opportunity, while on the other hand stands a perspective that it is unaffordable. The following paragraphs will discuss the advantages and demerits of both the stances taken with persistent aspects and examples.
There are myriad of reasons which proponents the cite of travel to study is beneficial. One of the most preponderant reasons is that studying abroad makes the student independent and have a different experience in life. To exemplify, those studied overseas develop the great sense of independence. Next, they get the numerous opportunities to explore and exposure to different culture and society. Furthermore, students who studied internationally are more prefered by the employers in the contemporary times. Thereby, it is apparent that travel is necessary for tertiary studies.
On contrary, there is another stratum of society who holds an opposing viewpoint and tend to believe that there are scholar students who studied locally and successful in their career. Moreover, these universities are quite expensive, costs more than 10 times than the local college. Because of this, students need to do part time job and choose the different field to support their parents. Hence, studying abroad is too expensive for parents and students.
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that the merits overweigh the disadvantages of abroad study and I profoundly believe that the idea of pursuing studies abroad contributes to the person's growth in personal, social and economic. Lastly, it also adds the practical experience in future career growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...e. Because of this, students need to do part time job and choose the different field to s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...suing studies abroad contributes to the persons growth in personal, social and economic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44680851064 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01527723201 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1799405009 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335735187508 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10483563071 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821388205219 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183380031067 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867163402672 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.