In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well.
Nowadays, the tourism in under developed countries has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question" is there any advantageous in it or not?". It is a widely held a view that tourism industry is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must carefully weigh up the pros and cons of it.
To begin with, there are many reasons that I believe the tourism plays a pivotal role in under developed countries culture. Firs and fore most is that tourism can provide people diverse culture and perspectives which result in wider individuals horizon. For example, a group of profound economist scientist working in a prestigious university, conducted a survey among different countries to understand the relationship between tourist and welfare. Therefore, the result revealed that those who have more tourism in their nations are three times more earn money in local areas.
On the other hand, needless to say many believe that there are many drawbacks of tourism in the developed countries. They argued that if authorities allowed people from all walks of life from different countries to visit these countries, it leds to distraction and disturtion of order and convinients of people. In addition, when tourists visit the developed countries they start to ask their governments to provide them such walfare and equipment they visited in that countries. Hence, there is a little room doubt that tourism should be control by developed countries.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the advantageous of tourism fur outweigh the disadvantageous. However, every garden may have some weeds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...in under developed countries has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... and perspectives which result in wider individuals horizon. For example, a group of profou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'controlled'?
Suggestion: controlled
...ittle room doubt that tourism should be control by developed countries. To recapitul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27067669173 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93569307914 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5223960403 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23404222169 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835461495611 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707226474391 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118566979303 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540743455144 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.