In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well.
These days, there is a controversial debate between people about the effects of tourism on developing countries. There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of tourism as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent view.
First of all, it is argued that tourism industry plays a pivotal role in the growth of a country’s economy. This is to say that tourism would imply an increasing need of various services such as water sanitation, road connectivity and well-equipped hospitals, so that this inevitably forces the government to accelerate the development of infrastructure in order to accommodate more visitors. Take the Kynia for example, a fast growing tourist destination, this country highly relies on tourism as a main source of income.
In addition, it is claimed that tourism could have positive impact on relationships between foreign countries. This may be attributed to the fact that tourism would open borders between countries, therefore, a tremendous number of people with different culture from different geographical locations are able to interact with other, which consequently promotes the peace across the world. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale university in 2014 has found that Western citizens could enhance the basic intellectual abilities of young generation in developing countries. As these examples illustrate, the benefit of tourism industry is obvious, and it could enormously and constructively affect the country infrastructure and improve the relationships between people over the world.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that tourism would economically and socially benefit the developing countries. It is expected that local authorities take the cognizance of these facts and enhances their infrastructure in order to attract more visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s take the cognizance of these facts and enhances their infrastructure in order t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73285198556 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23605484883 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581227436823 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3289464235 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.363636364 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.25397266985 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165329837766 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648992367213 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035355922485 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967209864389 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019976294746 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.