In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is increasing trends of tourism in undeveloped countries. People’s believe that tourism in underdeveloped countries has more disadvantages. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted so should be rejected.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons in favour of my stance, but the most significant one is that underdeveloped countries are thriving in tourism industry. If government put efforts to attract tourists from all over the world that this will not only help the economic situation of the country. As well as, it will bring jobs to local people which will help them to make their position financially better. Moreover, tourism helps to improve the infrastructure of the country which can be a positive point of view for tourism industry.
Another key justification for upholding my notion is that tourism will help to know people from all over the world. This will lead that people will know about the culture and experience of people from different parts of the word. Besides that, tourists can attract thieves because they usually bring expensive stuff with them which can be a negative aspect of tourism.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of tourism in underdeveloped countries are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tries are thriving in tourism industry. If government put efforts to attract touri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22790697674 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9742504089 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567441860465 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0447533312 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.181818182 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181853822153 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751375330264 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049650785799 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120291049965 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258539900798 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.