Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of universities marks deduct who students are late and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the complex procedures, is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I inclined to believe that deducting marks for students who are late can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, sometimes neglecting to student's responsibilities related to their school can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that selfsame, as well as independent character, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a researcher member in university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current findings. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, educational punishment might increase the consequences of responsibility in society. As a tangible example, some scientific investigations undertaken by a prestigious university throughout of the Europe countries. Hence, it is correct the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of decreasing of student's marks far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this updated pedagogical techniques prove the significance of the student's upbringing, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...echniques prove the significance of the students upbringing, but also pinpoint thorny is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95020746888 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4889332796 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684647302905 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0095211131 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.363636364 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204781213215 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716367261708 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107725583308 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109974887141 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113182763164 0.0609392437508 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.