The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, opinions, and solutions. Or should university penalize students for late submission of their work?
Recently the phenomenon of being delayed in delivering assignments and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that deducting score is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that this manner could lead to taking responsibility by students, and this essay will provide some solution for this issue before concluding.
From an educational standpoint, reducing some proportion of final mark could be beneficial for both students and authorities in terms of making youngsters more punctual. Furthermore, according to an academic survey conducted by Tehran University, deducting score could lead to increasing teamwork ability amongst a group of students who seek higher grade. Not to mention that this attitude could lead to increasing responsibility manner among the young generation and lead to better life in the future.
Within the realm of academic planning, professors, and teaching staffs could use some positive solution to make students more punctual. First and foremost, they could use encouragement for those of students who were early for the hand in their assignments. Secondly, authorities could follow up their procedure during their students’ time to fulfill the requirement. Lastly, authorities could set some exception rules for those of students who have some reliable and accurate reason for being delayed.
To recapitulate, although some opponents argued that setting penalty for being delayed in delivering assignments could lead to negative effects, I highly inclined to believe that its merits outweigh the disadvantages. Of course, setting academic curriculum could bring mage advantages for both students and teachers as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, well, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78066914498 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07235520563 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57249070632 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1891113405 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.583333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20016558353 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832134313651 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612026106677 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122456837385 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059957813425 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.