Vegetarianism has become increasingly popular in recent times. People often chose to become vegetarianism as it is considered more ethical than being a meat eater. In this essay we will discuss why vegetarianism is an ethical eating practice when compared to eating meat.
Vegetarianism is ethical than eating meat as it does not harm animals. Clearly, harming animals causes suffering which is unethical. For example, millions of pigs are killed every year in slaughter house for fulfilling the demand of meat. Vegetarians do not participate in the killing of animals, which is more ethical practice than eating meat.
Vegetarianism is also much more ethical than eating meat because its impact on the environment is far less. Growing vegetables is good for environment, whereas farming animals impacts the environment . A recent study has revealed that meat industry requires a lot of feed and millions of gallons of water to rear animals for meat. This clearly impacts the environment whereas vegetarianism is much more ethical as it does not harm the environment.
In this essay we discussed why vegetarianism is more ethical as it does not harm animals and does not damage environment. In my opinion, vegetarianism is a far more ethical practice than eating meat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... farming animals impacts the environment . A recent study has revealed that meat i...
^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more ethical practice than eating meat.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 31.9359605911 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 204.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26960784314 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0070470474 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 139.433497537 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485294117647 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.3272612167 50.4703680194 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.6923076923 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222458086542 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104415720682 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679101374943 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165437510054 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290686018876 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 55.0591133005 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.