What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented?
Most of the recent inventions stem from the fantasy of exploiting the technology to its edge rather than necessity. These inventions are unanimously exciting but surely are not essential to most of us unlike electricity or train. Although these new breakthroughs do have some advantages but the price to be paid is very high. Therefore, I tend to believe that we would be better off with such overwhelming volume of newly invented gadgets.
To start with, new inventions often tend to improvise on earlier product or tool, rendering it as outdated. Sometimes the temptation and other times the societal pressure forces us to switch on the newer version. Consequently, older version is set aside and remains unused, thereafter. In my own home, I have two Nokia handsets and two Samsung smart phones that are discarded despite being completely functional and without any hints of wear and tear. These new inventions, surely, are converting many functional machines into scrap.
Another disadvantage, in addition to this, is that new inventions are more repetitive than unique. The new breakthrough are mostly about replacing three or more tools by providing their features into one composite new product. In fact, humans can do many tasks flexibly using their body and simple tools but inventions eventually make them forget that usage and rely majorly on those tools. This habit of relying on complex tools is making us lazy too and thus leading to many health issues. Remarkably enough, a recent research conducted by a university confirms that simple tools are more robust, durable and useful than composite machines.
In conclusion, it is apparently evident that inventions despite aiming for better life have several disadvantages accounting to its influx rate. Consciousness and a little control on this surging trend of inventions are of paramount importance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29530201342 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84830348722 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647651006711 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6689777644 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.625 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164161585438 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051113754791 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397713251663 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970956944043 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308658274827 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.