As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you

Essay topics:

As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.

It is irrefutable that longevity of human life span is one of the top priorities of modern medical science. While, some opponents argued that long life with medical assistance is a must to ensure betterment and advancement of human endeavor, adherents of natural selection of life state different views. Considering the increasing wealth of knowledge every individual collects and disseminates to the society, I profoundly inclined to believe that artificial ways to increased life span is of minuscule application to overall well being of human kind with respect to earth's entire ecosystem. This essay will analyze both sides by providing some academic evidences before concluding.

On one hand, there are several obvious reasons why nature has set the life span of each species. Firstly, with every living thing having its own limit of lifetime, there are several challenges it must face to finally complete that life span and die naturally. During any such challenge, many times, the living being would not live anymore and succumb to the injuries. This is called way of natural selection. For example, human die of some disease early in their life if there if they are cured by their own body or by medical assistance.

Secondly, the main purpose of medical science should not be to alter the path of nature; instead it should be that of a supportive instrument and tool to allow follow that path in better health. For example, promotion of healthy lifestyle has long term benefits than the artificial supplements on every human.

On the other hand, according to opponents of natural selection scheme, there are many disadvantages associated with it. Primarily, the time invested in every human is considered too precious to be lost to some virus or epidemic. However, the lives that still alive are destined to be more successful than the one referred earlier.

To recapitulate, I pen down by saying that, while some people tend to argue that advancement in medical science to support long life is extremely valuable, I highly believe that natural selection procedure is the only provider of high quality human life, as a whole.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... long life with medical assistance is a must to ensure betterment and advancement of hu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...me disease early in their life if there if they are cured by their own body or by ...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...promotion of healthy lifestyle has long term benefits than the artificial supplement...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, with respect to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 31.9359605911 172% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1207.87684729 149% => OK
No of words: 351.0 242.827586207 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11396011396 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7134564822 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566951566952 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 379.143842365 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4685675216 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127797551636 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419633004519 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301757159521 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705366918706 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348721393764 0.0609392437508 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.