There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it?
We live in a world full of inventors and inventions. Likewise, there are many users of such newly invented products. While opponents suggest that the speed and volume of newly invented products gives them life full of opportunities where they can experience variety of things, proponents maintain that too much of invention has adverse overall effects. This essay is intended to put forward some arguments with examples before concluding.
Firstly, new inventions often tend to improvise on earlier product or tools, rendering it as outdated. People using one version cannot avoid upgradation to newer and better version. Consequently, older version is set aside and remains unused, thereafter. For example, according to a recent survey, 70% of electronics scrap was in good functional health but was discarded in favour of newer version. This strongly suggests that new inventions are responsible for large amounts of scrap.
Secondly, too many inventions are source of hoarding culture in the society. Humans can do many tasks flexibly using their body and simple tools but inventions effectively make them forget that usage and rely majorly on those tools. Moreover, composite tools are made to multiple tasks and ten there are other composite machines that do few similar tasks and few unique tasks. For instance, it is found in a research conducted in a university validates that simple tools are more stable, durable and useful than composite machines. This shows that it is a disadvantage that new inventions are more repetitive than unique.
In conclusion, it is highly evident that inventions, despite having aim of better life, have several disadvantages that account to its speed and volume. The control on speed and volume of inventions is very important in today's sensitive world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32631578947 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75552328737 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6482432011 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.875 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170340941995 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053146785995 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465086082494 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940090507535 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286070628923 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.