What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change?

Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate on solving the problem of climate change, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be said that governments, companies, and individuals can contribute to a great amount to eradicate this problem from the roots. This essay will further elaborate on the roles that each department can play to make our environment better and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are several steps that the government can take to overcome this problem but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that by making some strict regulation and laws for peolple who spoil the environment government can control over the activities. Because of the fear of these legislation the people will make improvement in their behavior. Thereby, the government can create a fear among people to prevent the environment from climate change.

On the contrary, the companies and individuals can also make a big change in environment conditions by being responsible of their duties towards the environment. Firstly, an individual can stop the over use of products that produce more carbon like as cars, motor bike, and wood fire. Reducing the use of services that produce more pollution can surely improve the surroundings. Finally, the companies can make some changes in the policies about using an appropriate method to decompose the waste.

In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the role of the governments, companies, and individuals in coping with the problem of climate change is instrumental indeed.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rnment can control over the activities. Because of the fear of these legislation the pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this legislation' or 'these legislations'?
Suggestion: this legislation; these legislations
... the activities. Because of the fear of these legislation the people will make improvement in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, so, thus, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2519379845 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87256375015 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.162573953 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.181818182 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167216869516 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695440148877 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811293870989 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13349675229 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10378777945 0.0609392437508 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.