What roles should governments, companies & individuals play to combat climate change?
In recent decades, a highly controversial issue has arisen regarding the climate change and the role of governments and individuals and companies to solve it. I firmly concur with the opinion that governments can adopt laws and policies, and the individuals can prevent from pollution, and the companies can utilise less carbon dioxide.
To begin with, governments with implementing policies can remedy the global warming and climate change. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further droughts and sea level rise. Subsequently, final results revealed a highly complex relationship between restriction and limitation even though forcing roles should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between the efforts of the governments and alleviating the climate change.
Furthermore, the individuals can evade the pollution to combat climate change. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning cars and river and air pollution. Hence, if scientific research is inextricably linked to traffics and people's activities, the preliminary findings are closely allied with the burning fewer fossil fuels.
Moreover, the companies can employ less carbon dioxide to solve the climate change. A notable example is using fewer fuels in organisations for their product. Hence, the likely outcomes can be significantly correlated with fewer global warming.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that remedy the climate change require the governments and the persons and organisations efforts to restrict the person's activities with laws and utilising less carbon dioxide. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to reduce the climate change.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82206405694 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06282291914 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597864768683 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3611519756 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187308359894 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681712743363 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738771924606 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105059749914 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480982935449 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.