What is your idea about lazy journalism that is common place in digitalized world?
In the competitive era, everyone is doing hard and stern jobs to get more fame and money. The phenomenon of the prevalence of lazy journalism and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. The lazy journalism refers to a lack of original ideas, excessive copy and paste in the journalism industry. I am inclined to believe that lazy journalism can be a minus, and I will analyze my views in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are myriad reasons to disagree with lazy journalism. In the tech-savvy era, a journalist may copy their news from the internet by replacing synonym words to make their own articles. but, this information that found from the internet can be fake and can endanger the reputation of newspapers and media. Moreover, the immediacy that the internet provides can be exhilarating, but it takes it challenging for journalists to verify the veracity of their sources.
Furthermore, another predominant reason for this problem of lazy journalism is caused by the work stress from editors as they often set up difficult goals to those instead of focusing on the quality of them. If originally and plagiarism both are not emphasized and penalized respectively, the lazy journalism may become rampant. In addition, lazy journalism can be defined as a style of journalism writing which lacks originality and filled with clichés.
In a nutshell, I profoundly believe that lazy journalism stands for biased journalists who constantly use unfair and inaccurate material and drawbacks of lazy journalism for outweighed its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...nonym words to make their own articles. but, this information that found from the i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22529644269 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01838637586 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1294396322 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.166666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173345676711 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717205997504 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573015973421 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118580847071 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586111676674 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.