What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world?
Recenty, the phenomenon of increasing the laziness among the journalists due to the digitalizing and technological features and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue is correct as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both clear and obvious, others do not deem its consequences. I am inclined to believe that we should dedicate more time to address its negative effects as it could develop some detrimental impacts on our lives.
From a social standpoint, the idea of the effects of modern technological features on journalism and alter the journalists's behaviour and attitudes to be more lazy than past, provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of the negative impacts of modernity. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these drawbacks and their reasons. Firstly, due to all features and accessabilities that the internet provides for us, a considerable amount of data is produced and existed. Hence, nowdays, journalists put less effort to recognise or investigate the data that they need.
Furthermore, this problem have the ability to produce some problems. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university, the number of fake news have raised in recent years because of this fact that journalists allocate insufficient time to analyze the data and news and some paramount details have not yet detected or revealed.
In conclusion, while there are several prominent reasons express that the lazy journalism can produce difficulties for nations due to modern and new technological advances, some journalists do not consider its outcomes and do not want to alter these circumstances.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45289855072 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21496472992 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.025269599 50.4703680194 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.9669160288 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895594116606 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289100437419 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396144402074 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494123844619 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159388722347 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.