what is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in digitalized world?
Recently, the phenomenon of the prevalence of lazy journalism and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. The lazy journalism refers to a lack of original ideas and excessive copy and paste in the journalism industry. I am inclined to believe that lazy journalism is a minus, and I will analyze in the upcoming paragraphs and lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad reasons to disagree with lazy journalism. In the tech-savvy era, a journalist may copy news from internet and replace it with own synonyms as their own articles. But it can endanger many reputed newspapers as the information might be fake at times. Moreover, it makes it challenging for journalists to verify the veracity of their sources. For illustration, According to report from Monash University, a leading newspaper has many fake articles published from the internet. As a result, lazy journalism can be a major drawback in this technological world.
Furthermore, another predominant reason for this problem for lazy journalism is the work stress caused by the editors in order to set up the difficult goals. Probing further, if both plagiarism and originality are not detected and penalized, it may become rampant. For instance, a recent report from the Oxford University states that around 80% of journalists copy work from various sources and modify it accordingly. Hence, lazy journalism will have no place in this digitalized world.
In recapitalation, this essay discussed about lazy journalism in this modern world. In my opinion, lazy journalism has negative impacts and will never have original sources.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28461538462 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04842572622 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573076923077 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5850200894 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 2.75862068966 399% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258435402616 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093763671334 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952354341218 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172634985221 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698087959029 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.