When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of productivity, and have made us less happy and more stupid because information is not knowledge.
Which of these points of view you do you agree with most? Support your argument with reasons or examples.
Computers have become an integral part of our lives and have made numerous of our jobs much more easier than earlier. Some people believe that computers have made us more efficient, smarter and happier, however opponents consider it as a means of disappointment by making us less happy and more stupid. I tends to believe that computers have truly made us more productive happy than stupid and less happy. This essay will discuss why computers have made us more efficient and blissful.
Undoubtedly, computers have made the information sharing much easier than it used to. In the past, the mode of transferring information was physical which has been completely shaped by the introduction of computers. Now we can easily share the information to anyone in the world via emails, and other source of mediums through internet. Thus, computers have provided us with the benefit of sharing any kind of information in a more easier way.
Furthermore, computers have also enabled us to store and access our data in a more convenient manner. More specifically, computers have a capability to store, access and retrieve data in a more concise way. By doing this job computers allowing us to do another thing of our interests which make us happy and satisfied. In brief, its depends on humans how to make use of computers in a proper manner to make best use out of it.
This essay discussed how computers enabled us to share the information easily and also helps in storing and accessing data in a more efficient way. In my opinion, computers have given us a reason to become happy and smart rather than being less happy and more stupid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...and have made numerous of our jobs much more easier than earlier. Some people believe that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'tend'
Suggestion: tend
...making us less happy and more stupid. I tends to believe that computers have truly ma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...of sharing any kind of information in a more easier way. Furthermore, computers have als...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... on humans how to make use of computers in a proper manner to make best use out of it. This ess...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than being less happy and more stupid.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, another thing, in brief, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86738351254 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69633646664 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1693245432 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277788932099 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119915207504 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602862921175 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181418883645 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055126480159 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.