Whether design of building will have a positive and negative impact on people's life and work
The importance of the whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s like works, which has been always debatable has now upsurged a lot of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has now become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrities are instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertions and provide a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the topic whether design of building more effect for the people’s life work is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that that advantage. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the whether design building will have a positive impact on people for the ameliorations of society.
However, it has some people who choose to think differently and hold an opposing viewpoints. Which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the whether design building will have a negative impact on people? Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the negative impact of the whether design building cannot be ignored.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the whether design building will have a negative and positive impact of people’s life and work. While it is evident it has
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'viewpoint'?
Suggestion: viewpoint
... think differently and hold an opposing viewpoints. Which can certainly overwhelm substant...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... impact of people's life and work. While it is evident it has
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.288 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10942052479 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0079973514 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.181818182 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.578372164127 0.242375264174 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214951467544 0.0925447433944 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203217626398 0.071462118173 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.406012933928 0.151781067708 267% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129920559746 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.