Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Of late there has been colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that design of buildings strongly influenced people’s way of living and work. However, some people opine that architechture of building has great impact on person’s living standards and work . In this essay, I shall highlight positive and negative impacts of buildings on people.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with association of humans with the structure of buildings in which they live. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that it bring phycological satisfaction to one’s mind. As a prime example, in most of the western societies structure of the buildings are well designed to meet the demand of people and same trend is being followed by underdeveloped nations. As a result, building structure has positive impact when comes to one’s psycological needs.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is the structure of buildings according to humans needs . This situation is clearly understood, if we think of our workplaces, where ventilation and direct access to sunlight are amongst the main focuses. Moreover, it helps to prevent certain diseases caused by deficiency of vitamin D, a natural vitamin from sunlight.
To recapitulate, foregoing dicussion propounds that building structure has quiet positive impact on human beings in terms of their living status and work premises. Thus, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ussing the fact that design of buildings strongly influenced people's way of...
^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that architechture of building has great impact on person's living standards...
^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct on person's living standards and work . In this essay, I shall highlight ...
^^
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...person's living standards and work . In this essay, I shall highlight positi...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e of buildings according to humans needs . This situation is clearly understood, i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45606694561 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97501403246 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623430962343 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4234254865 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321883592508 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113609809912 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928616106451 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186362516032 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129465799283 0.0609392437508 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.