Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of the building design having positive or negative impacts on people’s life and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that people’s life and work affected by building design can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, having positive impacts on people's work can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that critical issues and ultimate outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research and I discovered current issues. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, changing people's mood and condition by designing might increase the consequence of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of modern architectural design far outweigh, not only due to the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78968253968 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28246091137 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654761904762 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6896263565 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.9 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362987951477 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123270020253 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165207480572 0.071462118173 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190045146535 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18980486771 0.0609392437508 311% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.