Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work.
Recently the phenomenon of the Buildings appearance and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of people’s lifestyle is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial numbers of individuals. I am inclined to believe that work conditions can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern cities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in facts that the merits of Building a house, as well as living in town, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered job opportunities. Thus, beneficial ramification of the urban lifestyle and mega cities limitations apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, working circumstances might increase the consequences of the offices design. Moreover, fundamental aspects of relate to this reality that the demerits of the role of living pertain to the open plan design. As tangible example, some scientific research undertaken in a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the city’s development is correlated negatively with buildings facade. Hence, it is correct to presume the conceived notion of living conditions.
to conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the beneficial of designing of buildings far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages on modern lifestyle prove the significance of the employment rate, but also pinpoint towers structure implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...conceived notion of living conditions. to conclude, while there are several compe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6015625 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25044130117 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65234375 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5769033105 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167198433319 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490733222776 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398722421162 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881950423838 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543126236814 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.