Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?
Nowadays, recycling the household''s waste has become long-running dispute among the public all around the world which leads to a moot question who is responsible for this? it is a widely held view that the government must be legally held responsible for the problem mentioned above, while I tend to believe that the solution requires both authorities action and individuals decision.
From a social point of view, recycling the wastes is indeed bound to keeping the environments clear and hygiene, which it might lead to both individuals and animals health. For instance, a group of profound scientists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between laws and people as well as keeping the environment clean. This evidence presented to thus far support the contention that introducing a law is positively correlated with not only keep our nature clean but also keep it for the next generation.
Moreover, in political terms, households'' waste is undoubtedly attributable to teaching people, in that it would lead to reducing the wastes, costs. A well-known example of such attribution is London, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken in taking environments preservation for granted. Thus, teaching could play a significant role in encouraging people to recycle their waste.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the government must teach the public and also must pas the strict laws about recycling the households' waste.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...t question who is responsible for this? it is a widely held view that the governme...
^^
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authorities'' or 'authority's'?
Suggestion: authorities'; authority's
...believe that the solution requires both authorities action and individuals decision. From ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'environments'' or 'environment's'?
Suggestion: environments'; environment's
...rn since it had been mistaken in taking environments preservation for granted. Thus, teachin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35593220339 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05196542605 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.9125892607 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.444444444 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176093263559 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735537746478 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479627877255 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104484737078 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.000956715339904 0.0609392437508 2% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.