Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?
Nowadays, recycling households'''' waste has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world which leads to a moot question who is responsible of this issue? It is a widely held view that governments must be held responsible of the mentioned issue, while I tend to believe that the solution needs both authorities action and individuals' decision.
In social point of view, recycling wast is indeed bound to keeping nature clean, which it might lead to both keeping animals' and humans' habitat clean and hying. For instance, a group of profound environmentalists, working in a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study of relationship between keeping nature hying and recycling waste efficiency as well as reducing illness. this evidence presents thus far supports the contention that recycling households' WATS is positively correlated with not only governmental laws but also people''''s responsibilities.
Moreover, in economical terms, recycling waste is undoubtedly attributable to make money, which it would to reduce families costs, make some products cheaper and a financial source for governments. A well-known such of attribution is plastic, which is cause of concern since it had been mistaken in taking environments preservation for granted. Have some rules passed in advance, it might have had a opportunity to save money more and more. Thus, recycling wast could play a significant role in economy.
To recapitulate, i firmly believe that recycling wast must be taken into consideration. However, as ever garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to higher their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
..., recycling households waste has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authorities'' or 'authority's'?
Suggestion: authorities'; authority's
...to believe that the solution needs both authorities action and individuals decision. In so...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...efficiency as well as reducing illness. this evidence presents thus far supports the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...peoples responsibilities. Moreover, in economical terms, recycling waste is undoubtedly a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'environments'' or 'environment's'?
Suggestion: environments'; environment's
...rn since it had been mistaken in taking environments preservation for granted. Have some rul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...es passed in advance, it might have had a opportunity to save money more and more...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50957854406 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22775503228 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4232373696 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.727272727 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241538322656 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894566909926 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608742343296 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133229607492 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224382914047 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.