Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning experimentally and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matter of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. In my opinion, I am convinced to believe that experience in learning could be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
Form a general standpoint, practical learning could provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcome are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both these common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, developing of experimental learning might increase the consequences of critical needs.As a tangible example, some scientific research, undertaken bt prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable learning method.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments in on both side, I profoundly hold the view that the benefits of learning in experience instead of reading books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique method prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the realm of public arena, developing of experimental learning might increase the...
^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ease the consequences of critical needs.As a tangible example, some scientific res...
^^
Line 8, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... unique method prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79752066116 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23373180371 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702479338843 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2628409553 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.3 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11906765207 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428102482399 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343331264505 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646070396999 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216681644447 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.42 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.