Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of the bneficial impacts of utilizing experimental courses in the formal curriculum has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this idea is advantageous as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why practical methods has beneficial influence on the formal education. These are rooted in the fact of modern education. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these merits. Firstly, technical and experimental courses are more interesting than the formal ones and have the ability to alter the dull sense among the pupils. Furthermore, the youths encounter with more details which is quite crucial for analyzing the processes. Moreover, this way of instructing prepare the young generation to utilize the theoretical concepts in practical way. Hence, the efficiency and productivity will be enhanced by this kind of educating.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, some other faculties asserted that the experimental duties have not ample effectiveness. They argue that reading books, articles and thises is the best way for instructing and learning. They cliamed that practical courses has more details and pupils relatively have not adequate concentrations to get the information.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the technical and experimental way of studying has beneficail effects on the formal and theoretical education.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56179775281 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13057089465 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1442307438 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160311969493 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048356052477 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370218832257 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955281170256 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423957203109 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.