Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree or experiences is more effective way to teach compared to books?
In this time and era, many people are interested in practical learning this becomes a debatable issue. Nowadays people are studying with experimental learning which provides experiences for future. Experience is more effective way to teach comparing with book. I completely agree with this statement.
To begin with, nowadays many people are learning in practically and visually. Children can learn better with practical work, so many schools are providing practically classes from the primary education. Books will provide information about the subject. For example, books will provide only techniques and concept, it will not provide possible mistakes and error of it, hence practical work will prove the experience of it and enhance the possibility to improve the skills individual.
Secondly, the human nature is instead of learning in books practical experiences will live long time in their minds, and also experiencing correct knowledge of the product. Books provide the information, strategies, planning, marketing process to implement this we need to get a lot of experience. For example, without having practical knowledge implementation of any project will not be succeeded, the best example for this is airplane and bulb experiments.
To conclude with this, practical work have converts hectic work to understand easily. There are ample of reasons people should approach on practical work for better understanding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ically and visually. Children can learn better with practical work, so many schools ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, second, secondly, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65740740741 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93458633919 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5134267555 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6153846154 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209505540264 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928040800462 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109391184527 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130543235316 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767335183829 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.