Recently, the phenomenon of banning age discrimination at workplace and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that stopping such unfair behavior is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that calling discrimination against older employees illegal can be a plus, and I will explain that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, stopping discrimination against old workers can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that hiring and firing staff, as well as considering promotions in workplace, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic survey and discovered more job discrimination among aged workers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both legal considerations and moral issues apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of personal desires, unfairness based on age might increase the consequences of violation in workplace. Moreover, fundamental aspects of supervising and controlling employees relate to this reality that the demerits of this brutal behavior pertain to irreparable consequences. As a tangible example, a scientific research conducted by prestigious University of Chicago has asserted that the downside of age discrimination in workplace is correlated negatively with feeling content. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of banning this cruel action by authorities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of banning discrimination against old workers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of stopping unfair behavior based on age of employees prove the significance of social equality, but also pinpoint important implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly believe that the benefits of banning discrimination against old workers far o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85512367491 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38416297304 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636042402827 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2834148789 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.083333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22114902561 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722329116363 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438982496316 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127294710636 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225223798646 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.