The author describes that a professional painting of a teenage girl is the Jane Austen portrait and provides three reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the lecturer states that the evidence for making this link is not convincing and this portrait is loosely connected to Jane Austen family; moreover, it is hardly proved that Jane Austin as a teenage girl is the subject of this painting and refutes each of the author’s reasons with rational grounds.
First of all, the writer states that the Austen family has subscribed to the view that the girl in the portrait is Jane Austen. Nevertheless, the professor points out that when Austen's family wanted to get authorization for publishing the letters, Jane was dead for seventeen years. To be more specific, even though they asserted that the portrait was Jane, they had never seen her before.
Second, according to the reading, the face in the portrait obviously represents the one in Cassandra's sketch, which we know illustrates Austen. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that maybe one of Jane Austen's relatives is the subject of the portrait, and there is no connection between the subject of the professional painting and Cassandra's sketch. As a matter of fact, she had a large family with a lot of teenagers which resemble her face. Thus, one of them can be the subject of the portrait; for example, Marie Kanprien.
Third, the writer expresses that there is evidence that the portrait was painted when Austen was a teenager. The speaker posits that only the style of the painting links it to Ozias Humphrey due to the stamp on the canvas. What's more, the blank canvas was sold by a person named William Leg and he did not sell it when he was in London and when Austen was a teenager, but when Austen was 29 years old. Hence, the canvas was older than the time when Austen was a teenager.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make any sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...umphrey due to the stamp on the canvas. Whats more, the blank canvas was sold by a pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, for example, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76035502959 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53704219571 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2902858668 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.590045152397 0.272083759551 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214234139831 0.0996497079465 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113874973116 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285071952491 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146247460587 0.0443174109184 330% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.