Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now ‘one big traffic jam.’
How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
For over the last 30 years, the number of cars on the roads has been increasing quickly which become the major reason for traffic congestion in many cities across the world. I think this is completely true and there are, fortunately, some solutions that the government could have to reduce the use of cars.
No one can deny that there are now too many cars take part in traffic of a city everyday. This is because of the fact that most people find this vehicle to be very comfortable means for transport. Besides, thanks to some certain trading policies of the government and the competition between car producers, it is easier for individuals to own cars. Therefore, the amount of cars rising so fast. In my city, the number of cars even higher than that of other transportations. This cause many problems of which traffic congestion is one.
There are several actions that government could take to solve the problems described above. Firstly, a simple solution would be to impose more taxes on people who use or own cars so that the price of car will increase. If it is more expensive to own a car, people may not choose to have one. The second measure would be band cars travel in city central in rush hours. The last solution would be to improve the quality of public transportations to encourage citizens to use them instead of depending on cars.
In conclusion, I believe that the increasing amount of cars leads to the issue of traffic congestion in cities and measures to solve this are always available.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...any cars take part in traffic of a city everyday. This is because of the fact that most ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... in traffic of a city everyday. This is because of the fact that most people find this vehicle to be ver...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71535580524 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60243304876 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535580524345 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4797853106 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9285714286 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301289847988 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104034609183 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507866394388 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188377589134 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257315431129 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.