TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t

Both the reading and the lecture are about archaeology in Britain. The writer states that archeology in Britain faces difficulties and gives three reasons of support. However, the professor states that with the new guideline archeology in Britain is better than past and refutes each of the author's reasons.

First, the writer states that plenty of precious archeology findings destroyed in building projects. The professor refutes this point. He states according to new guideline new construction projects can only start after the archeologic examination. What's more if the archeologists find anything which archeologically valuable then archeologists make plan in order to preserve. Furthermore, document properly.

Second, the article claims that people who work as archeologist can not get enough funding. The professor casts doubt onto this claim by stating the company who build has construction project has to pay money for initial examination. He states this money can usable for studies.What's more, thanks to new guideline, archeology get better funding than past.

Third, the reading states that there are only few jobs available for archaeologist On the other hand, the professor states a lot of paid jobs are did not exist before the guideline. Many experts can work all stages of examination of construction place. What's more for preserving and process data is also job opportunity for archaeologist. He states career opportunity for archeologist in Britain is greatest of all time.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is better than past and refutes each of the authors reasons. First, the write...
^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...tart after the archeologic examination. Whats more if the archeologists find anything...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whats
...tates this money can usable for studies.Whats more, thanks to new guideline, archeol...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...tates this money can usable for studies.Whats more, thanks to new guideline, archeol...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...money can usable for studies.Whats more, thanks to new guideline, archeology get ...
^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...professor states a lot of paid jobs are did not exist before the guideline. Many e...
^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...s of examination of construction place. Whats more for preserving and process data is...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...for preserving and process data is also job opportunity for archaeologist. He state...
^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...portunity for archeologist in Britain is greatest of all time.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, third, as to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51515151515 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01183612393 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593073593074 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3216931929 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9333333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174912968076 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635696297869 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358717046133 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110774971903 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433687153054 0.0443174109184 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.