“Governments are justified in circumventing civil laws when doing so is vital to the protection of national
security.”
Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your
position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true.
The author's claim about governments justification of circumventing the civil laws and also claiming that in doing so, the protection of national security is of tantamount importance. Yes, I believe with what author has stipulated. Civil laws are as importance as human rights to every citizen of a nation. Abiding these civil laws and justifying when they are not executed is important and plays a vital role in protecting the nation's security. Thus, the author's claim is quiet debatable.
All most all the nations in this world have civil laws framed adaptable to their respective nations. For example, keeping the city or the nation clean and tidy is one of the civil laws that has been passed in many nations. Countries such as India which is still called a developing nation, has passed many civil laws to keep the country clean. The prime minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, upheld a mission "Swatch Bharath", which means to keep the nation India natty is in move and everyone are abiding by this civil law to keep the city. Prior to these laws, certain laws to keep some public places like dams, rivers, monuments clean are passed. But the mission, "Swatch Bharath", imbibes all such cleanliness, hence circumventing the older civil laws matter much as the main mission keeps all civil laws intact.
On the similar lines, traffic rules also a part in civil laws. Countries such as England, follow very strict traffic rules and regulations. By doing so, a safe driving sense awareness is created among the people of respective nation, which in turn decreases the possibility of brutal accidents. Laws like driving slowly near rocky and fern areas, not to horn near hospitals and schools are the basic civil laws that are amended and the people follow these civil laws. As said in the previous paragraph, certain civil laws, implicates the laws, such a way that following the main motive will implicitly follow the previous laws. This basically done to avoid the redundancy of the laws. By doing so, it preserves the national security and at the same time the law would have been abide.
Although, it is said that to avoid the redundancy, some rules can be circumvented, some of the civil laws pertaining to medical and military filed should not be ignored very easily. Because, the more strict the rules to be followed in military, the more strong the nation will become. Hence, before circumventing any rule proper justification should be given by the governments so the national security is preserved.
Thus, in total, as per the author, with proper justification by the governments, circumventing the civil laws are agreeable, but at the same time these circumvents should also not hamper in preserving the national security.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...nd plays a vital role in protecting the nations security. Thus, the authors claim is qu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ALL_MOST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'almost'?
Suggestion: Almost
...he authors claim is quiet debatable. All most all the nations in this world have civi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'abided', 'abode'.
Suggestion: abided; abode
...t the same time the law would have been abide. Although, it is said that to avoid ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ndancy, some rules can be circumvented, some of the civil laws pertaining to medical and mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04366812227 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71175874926 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475982532751 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5407244904 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68181818182 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215505732444 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065199124941 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052602807273 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119730355621 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368124513591 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.