Whether experimental learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education, Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning by experience rather than books has become a debatable topic. While some people agree that effective learning is possible through experience others, maintain that learning can be possible only through books. This essay will discuss the views of proponents and opponents of this statement and thus lead to a plausible solution.
To begin with, people who are in favour of learning through experiences, strongly say that experience means the knowledge earned by performing day-to-day activities. Experience is always unlimited as it is varied from activities to activities and one cannot find the each-and-every situation in books. In addition to this, learning through experience enhances your skills to fight in different situations that people face in daily life. They make things to be remembered easily as one can forget the bookish knowledge easily rather than lessons learned from any practical experience.
On the other hand, there are some people who disagree and assert that books give a person a deep knowledge of any situation. Without reading books, one can never resolve any problem in any situation. For instance, there are some scenarios where a person applies the knowledge gained from books rather than from their own experience. We cannot think of getting valuable experience without the involvement of books. Also, books are the medium to transfer techniques discovered in ancient time and improve them.
In conclusion, learning through various experiences rather than formal education plays a vital role in today’s world. In my opinion, people find it more effective and easy learning by experiences.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47674418605 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81003474974 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3437117347 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.928571429 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169130902957 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593136012482 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575908093455 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116458879518 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549688837145 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.