Employers/Authorities of a company should take suggestions or ideas from employees in taking any decision. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Involving sub staff in decisions of a company is a valid idea as it affects company’s success. I truly agree with this statement given above. In this essay, I will elaborate my opinion to some extent.
No doubt, employees are the backbone of any company who plays a vital role in the immense growth of the company. Employees must be a part of any decision of a company that impacts them directly or indirectly. By doing so, they will feel more connected to the company which will result in increasing their productivity as a whole. On the other hand, it will be good for the company as well, for example, if we talk about an Information Technology company, employees can play a major role in deciding the technology they can adopt. It will enhance their performance, moreover, they will get the opportunity to work on the technology they want.
As every coin has two sides, decisions based on employees advice can be biased resulting in employees misusing it to their own axe to grind. Consequently, it can be a cause of envy among them. Suppose if a decision is made according to a bunch of employees, other employees will get demotivated. This can ruin the company’s environment and reputation in the market as well.
To sum up, there is no doubt that employees suggestions can be very helpful for a company but it should be taken care that other employees may not get hurt by these decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... coin has two sides, decisions based on employees advice can be biased resulting in emplo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, no doubt, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72874493927 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86097064127 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574898785425 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4147467652 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8461538462 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154243991434 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586985982381 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394731135054 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100698848606 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235330398432 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.