Advantages & Disadvantages of Cashless Society.
A cashless society is the one in which people use more Credit and Debit Cards instead of carrying Cash in their wallets. I believe that a community which is cashless has lots of benefits to offer. I will discuss both benefits and drawbacks of the cashless society in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with the demerits, first of all, if the society goes cashless altogether, it can become more spend-thrift. If people carry cards all the time and every shop and vendor has a swiping machine available, people can become impulse buyers and end up purchasing things which they do not even require. Next, as the cards are tiny, they can easily drop from the pockets, and people can lose a lot of money if they do not notice it promptly.
On the contrary, there are plenty of benefits of going cashless. The most significant advantage is that people need not carry bulky wallets all the time. These days, there are Smartphone cases available, which have a card pocket made in them. People can keep all their cards in them and save their pocket space. Furthermore, carrying cards is safer because even if people lose them, they can promptly intimate their Bank to cancel their card on the spot. But, if they have cash in their wallet, and they lose it, they can never get the money back.
Moreover, paying by card saves money in long run. For example, if we purchase an item for $24.48 and we pay in cash, it gets rounded off, and we are supposed to pay $24.50. But if we tap the card instead, we spend the exact amount. It might not appear to be a significant saving, but when we always use the card to pay for everything, we can save a lot of money.
In conclusion, becoming cashless brings in just a few disadvantages, but if people stay more conscious, they can avail a plethora of its advantages. Every country should go cashless and lead a secure life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 20.9802955665 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 335.0 242.827586207 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5671641791 5.00649968141 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42233977936 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519402985075 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.6157635468 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8497533369 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0738111508204 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354556772081 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412018661563 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556065875153 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431794470607 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.1260098522 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.9458128079 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.5310837438 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.