In towns and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small local shops. Do you agree or Disagree?
In recent years, small local shops have been replaced by huge shopping malls that have sparked a controversy over the potential impact of this trend. While many people are in favor of having large shopping malls instead of local shops, others reject this notion. This essay will discuss the positive and negative effects and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, large shopping malls are very popular among people these days as one can find anything from needle to car under one roof. Moreover, you can buy things with heavy discounts as shopping mall generally offer things at cheaper rates as compared to local shops. In addition to this, one can have access to enormous facilities under one roof. For instance, there are cafés for coffee, shops for grocery, clothes and even playing area for children. In shopping malls, there is a lot of parking space available to park the vehicle which is difficult to find out at other places.
On the other hand, we get fresh items from local shops as they buy in fewer quantities which is a major reason to buy anything from the local shop. Local shops do not require a large area for their establishment and even it consumes less energy as they need not show their items so flashy. People living far from the city can get the benefit of local shops as they cannot visit cities very often for small things.
In conclusion, large shopping malls and local shops have their own advantages and disadvantages. In my opinion, the benefits of shopping malls outweigh the small local shops as they have more advantages than local shops.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80363636364 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27568970564 2.71678728327 84% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556363636364 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.6913068102 50.4703680194 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307391646605 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122452230263 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883516980611 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210984327555 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650304822294 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.