Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To the what extent do you agree or dis-agree?
Medical Science & technology have made a remarkable progress in each and every filed today. There is no denying that due to a drastic change in medical science the life expectancy of the human being is increasing day by day. Some people consider this is one of the greatest achievement of society while some ignore this notion. In this essay, I am going to deliver the necessary arguments before jumping to the conclusion.
To begin with the positive side, there are myriad benefits of medical science but the most conspicuous one is, nowadays there is an early detection of life-threatening diseases like Cancer and Aids. Moreover, nearly most of the hospitals are having forefront technology so people do not have to move from city to another for various treatments and surgeries. For example, as per the recent survey, now not only private hospitals but also the government hospitals even have the MRI scanners so one can take the benefit of it.
Additionally, with the improvement in the medical technology, the expense of regular health check-up and constant observation is burning a hole in one’s budget. It is good that one can stay with his family and enjoy the happy moments but financial burden is a sweltering question.
To sum up, from the aforementioned points, it is quite noticeable that with the improvement in the medical technology, people are getting aware about their health and taking right decision but the financial burden is also a fundamental issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'remarkable progress'.
Suggestion: remarkable progress
... Medical Science & technology have made a remarkable progress in each and every filed today. There is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07346938776 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84490411269 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604081632653 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2559185402 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116932283563 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437704483945 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366421550789 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606025405448 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271238301197 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.