TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Considering the aspects of human life illustrates the truth, which is the most sensational issue in social communication. Were people always tell truth to each other, they would have a healthy society and plethora of humanists. Therefore, telling the truth must be converted to the indispensable issue to any connections among people. From my perspective, many people try to conserve their habit of truth and I am going to illustrate this owing to two important reasons.
Firstly, I can find a strong connection between a person who always tries to tell the truth and my decision to trust them. I think the other healthy mind people have the same idea. You feel convenience among the people always telling the truth and have a friendly connection with them. If you have a connection with someone telling many lies, then you know you cannot trust that person. Since, when that person starts to say something, you will not know this thing is right or not. A story was told us about a shepherd who started to lie to people of his village. He told a simple lie two times to his people about a group of wolfs attacking to his herd. The third time this really happened to him and when he tries to say a truth, nobody believed him. As an example, I had a relationship with someone who did not always tell the truth to me. Many times, I heard something from that person and I experienced something else. Consequently, I could not trust and broke up my relationship with him. As you can see, the truth is vital to trust other people.
Besides, another important issue is about telling the truth to yourself. If you do not tell the truth to yourself, then you trick yourself and it is easy to fail in your life. Therefore, telling the truth to yourself is important and determines how to be successful in your life. You also change to be more powerful and adopt yourself with sociality better. For instance, I failed in one of my exams and did not obtain a proper score. Before that, I had believed to myself and always told to myself: “I am in good condition in this course.” However, I was not in good condition and told lie to myself. Consequently, I learned not to trick and to be honest with myself. As a result, even though some of the truth is not joyful, telling the truth to yourself is substantial for each person.
In a nutshell, telling the truth become accustomed to each person. Truth helps people to trust each other easily. They are, also, trustful with themselves. I think the sociality change atmosphere of their country for people to be more honest and this thing helps people to enjoy more from each other.

Votes
Average: 9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[2]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: Where; We
...sational issue in social communication. Were people always tell truth to each other,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 706, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...e this real happened to him and when he try to say a real truth, nobody believed hi...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, third, as to, for instance, i think, you know, as a result, to tell the truth

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57569296375 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54677778326 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430703624733 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5964208384 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4814814815 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3703703704 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203427847768 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659974424891 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499017232936 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124290245778 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043680000881 0.0645574589148 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.