The reading passage and the lecture are both about on the archaeology history and it's changes going through the entire centuries, thus importance should be under vision. The author of the reading explains that, this particular field is getting vanish in the Britain and lost it's value. While, the professor casts doubt made in the article. He says that, take into this interest, according to new guide lines, it becomes more valuable.
First, the article describes that, now-a-period of time, many new infrastructure are developing, due to this, the archaeology sites is going to destroyed. In contrast, the lecturer states that, it is more now in discuss, when formation site is under observation, it first processes by an archaeologist and after their approval, more planes will be proceed.
Secondly, the passage contends that, financial structure is really important for the these kinds of fields, so there is insufficient amount available. The speaker rebuts this argument, he says that, in actual, now government is taking the whole charge and showing responsibility towards this archaeology science.
Lastly, the author claims that, there is no career, in addition, no jobs are presented in days, which is showing nothing encouragement for the future adoption on this science. On the other hand, the moderator posits that, there are conducting research on this that many of the new young generation, in obvious, are attracting towards this special field of archaeology and are engaging their interest more to this. Hence it is cleared by the professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nish in the Britain and lost its value. While, the professor casts doubt made in the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'destroy'
Suggestion: destroy
...this, the archaeology sites is going to destroyed. In contrast, the lecturer states that,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e engaging their interest more to this. Hence it is cleared by the professor.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28514056225 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81780073244 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8781849881 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.636363636 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15343447519 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583972335152 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458167076491 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981043328853 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197251133249 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.