The question of doing public service work by young people has always been a controversial point for the majority of people. In particular, It has become apparent that are especially concerned about such an aspect of the topic at hand as whether pupils should do such kind of works as part of their educational program or not. As for myself, I tend to believe that it can be useful for youngsters to be involved in social welfare work sometimes. In the rest of the essay, I will proceed with arguments in support of my stance.
While there are number of possible way to justify my position, one main arguments in this debate is that education should not be limited to strictly academic pursuits. Therefore, it can be exhausting and harmful for children’s health just sit at the desk and do some writing tasks constantly. Furthermore, the most fruitful curriculum as a rule includes the alternation of different types of activity. For instance, scientists recommend to change exercises training different skills, such as listening, speaking or reading between themselves from time to time. In their point of view, it promotes better absorption of materials.
A different yet principal aspect is that this kind of works develops life skills, such as teamwork, empathy and self-discipline. It is undoubtedly that people who frequently busy at such kind of occupation subsequently gets only the best human qualities.
On the other hand, some people declare that it violates the freedom of children. I find this argument without merit for the following reason: as long as youngsters do useful work such as cleaning in the local park or helping for elderly people it cannot be something that infringes their rights or freedom.
In general, while arguments of proponents may be relevant, they are not sufficient to convince me. I am totally sure that it can be beneficial for future life of seniors to participate in such community works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to plan'
Suggestion: to plan
...Furthermore, the most fruitful learning plan as a rule includes the alternation of d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, as for, for instance, in general, in particular, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02167182663 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89708518841 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59133126935 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5331243464 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.133333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235195086782 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742031235317 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675000017277 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12791121976 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685830629599 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.